European Cup, semi-final, first leg
MANCHESTER UNITED 1 (O'Shea 17)
ARSENAL 0
And the consensus opinion of the sports pages this morning? That Utd were deserving winners last night, but that their dominance should have translated to more goals and put the tie beyond Arsenal. The Sun's Steven Howard pretty much sums it up:
"Even one-eyed Gooners — who had a ghastly, panoramic view of the one-way traffic in the first half — will admit they should have been obliterated, decimated, wiped off the European map.
So badly were they under the cosh at times, you wondered by what miracle they had actually made it to this Champions League semi-final in the first place.
That they actually survive to fight another day still in one piece will be one of the great mysteries of all time — one for the minds of Sherlock Holmes, Hercule Poirot and every CSI programme from London to Las Vegas."
So battered, but not killed off. Yet most commentators still think that Utd are clear favourites to progress to their second European Cup final in as many years. Here's Matt Dickinson in the Times:
"And when it all finished, despite the narrow scoreline and the advantage to United of a solitary goal, you were left to conclude that it would be a miracle if this Arsenal team were being saluted a month from now as champions of Europe."
The Arsenal keeper, Manuel Almunia, earns a great deal of praise for keeping his side in the tie. The Daily Mail even speculates whether the Spaniard - who qualifies for British citizenship at the start of next season - could soon be England's number one:
"On last night's showing he may be the safest hands for England, even if he is as English as paella. At least he's playing regular Champions League football."
While, on the Utd side, a few papers make the point that Michael Carrick looked back to his best, and cite the ease with which Patrice Evra dealt with the fast-running threat of Theo Walcott. Most of the praise, thought, is reserved for the industrious performance of Carlos Tevez, who was behind much of United's best play in the first half. The Mail's Martin Samuel and the Times's Matt Hughes both devote articles to the tireless Argentinian, yet both suggest that he's most likely still on his way out of Old Trafford. Here's Hughes:
"Whether one night can alter either player’s future remains doubtful, with Berbatov far more likely to start next season at the club. For all his unhappiness Tévez is so volatile that he would happily eat his words and sign a new contract if it was offered to him tomorrow, though given his £22 million price tag that is a remote possibility.
The grubby machinations of the money men — football’s politicians — will prove his undoing."
The Guardian carries a good roundup of the two managers' views, including this quote from Sir Alex:
"We tend to do things the hard way at our club and once again it's a night when our supporters have been frustrated because we could have been in the final. We had enough chances to score four but their goalkeeper was really fantastic."
And some barbed reflections on the weekend fixtures from the Utd manager:
Wenger can also afford to make wholesale changes when Arsenal play Portsmouth on Saturday, whereas United do not have that luxury. "That's Arsenal's advantage," said Ferguson. "They can play Pat Rice at right-back and Arsène Wenger can play centre-forward; it doesn't matter to them. We have to put out a team to win at Middlesbrough in a lunchtime kick-off. I don't think it [the early start] is right but we have to get on with it."
Finally, returning to the Sun's Steven Howard again, I liked this fact in his column:
"While United boasted multi-championship and cup winners, Arsenal could only muster five Premier League titles, five FA Cups, one League Cup, one Champions League and one World Club Cup.
And of those 13 medals, EIGHT belonged to former United defender Silvestre."
Let's hope that Silvestre doesn't get the chance to add to his tally at our expense, next Tuesday.
Pete
Recent Comments